The Industry Looks Forward To The Introduction Of The Supporting Rules For The Evaluation Of Corporate Environmental Credit.

< p > > recently, < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/list.aspx ClassID=101112107107" > environmental protection department < /a > together with the national development and Reform Commission, the people's Bank of China and the Banking Regulatory Commission jointly issued the "enterprise environmental credit evaluation method (Trial Implementation)" (hereinafter referred to as the "measures") to guide enterprises to carry out corporate environmental credit evaluation, and urge enterprises to fulfill their statutory obligations and social responsibilities for environmental protection, and restrain and punish corporate environmental dishonesty. Industry experts welcome this move, but at the same time worry that if the rules do not have the supporting rules, the excellent enterprises in the industry will be "red card" and become the target of attack. For this reason, experts have called for the introduction of relevant reasonable rules according to the actual situation of the industry, so as not to injure the excellent enterprises, and cause serious growth of small businesses, resulting in "bad money drives out good money". < /p >
< p > industry experts say that the industry has objections to the following three points in the "measures". < /p >
< p > > the enterprises in heavy polluting industries defined in the "measures", < a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/list.aspx ClassID=101112107105" > heavy polluting industries < /a > include: thermal power, steel, cement, textile and other 16 industries. In an interview with reporters, industry experts said that it is questionable to include the textile industry in the heavy polluting industry, because textile industry is a widely covered industry. From the perspective of production, according to the raw materials, production processes and final uses of the products, the textile industry mainly includes cotton textile, wool textile, hemp textile, silk, chemical fiber, printing and dyeing, knitting, yarn dyed, clothing, household textiles, industrial textiles, textile machinery and equipment industries. Most of them, except printing and dyeing, are not heavy polluting industries. < /p >
< p > in addition, the first part of the general principles of the measures shall be included in the scope of environmental credit evaluation, and the state key monitoring Enterprises promulgated by the Ministry of environmental protection. Industry experts have different views on this: "this does not mean that the non key monitoring enterprises are included in the scope. In many industries, the key enterprises are mainly small businesses, which are the main sources of pollution. Key monitoring enterprises basically implement automatic monitoring of pollution sources, real-time data detection, linkage with on-site monitoring, and less likely to steal illegal emissions. Therefore, we should segment the industry and bring the pollution less serious non polluting enterprises into the scope of credit evaluation. < /p >
< p > the industry responded strongly to the second clause in the fifteenth article stipulated in the measures: "the environmental impact assessment document of the construction project has not been approved according to the regulations, and the construction has been started without authorization". The implementation of "one vote veto" has been directly assessed as a "bad environmental protection enterprise". This clause does not specify in detail what items are included in the "construction project". If it is a newly built factory, if the EIA or EIA fails to pass the examination and approval, it will start construction and production without authorization. This is certainly not in conformity with the regulations. Enterprises need to carry out transformation and upgrading through technological transformation projects. Do they need the EIA approval? Because many local EIA procedures are more complicated, some places simply stop printing and dyeing enterprises' EIA. If the technology transformation project is included in the scope, it will cause enterprises to fall into the paradox of "no technological transformation, death, technological transformation and death". < /p >
< p > industry experts for example, for example, in the Taihu rim region, some of the backward a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/list.aspx ClassID=101112107108" > printing and dyeing enterprise < /a > has been put together and some outstanding excellent printing and dyeing enterprises have encountered outstanding difficulties: declare technological transformation, environmental impact assessment is not given, approval documents are not approved, and the direct result is that these enterprises can not carry out technical transformation projects or illegally implement them. Related enterprises to explain to the relevant departments, technological transformation is to protect the environment, for example, the larger bathing bath is replaced by a small bath rather than the dye vat. This is to eliminate the high energy consumption and high pollution equipment to achieve energy saving and emission reduction. It should be encouraged, but the local environmental protection department will not give the EIA. If enterprises carry out technological transformation for energy conservation and emission reduction, they will be illegally started. In accordance with the "measures", such enterprises are within the scope of one vote veto, which results in the implementation of technical transformation, and the replacement of equipment for energy conservation and emission reduction is illegal and will be given a red card. This will directly affect the survival of enterprises, and obviously contrary to the transformation and upgrading of industries encouraged by the state. Therefore, industry experts suggest that the "measures" should be issued supporting documents, detailed provisions which must be given environmental impact assessment, automation, intelligent degree, energy consumption and water consumption low energy conservation and emission reduction projects should give priority to environmental impact assessment, this will not cause illegal transformation of enterprises or at a low level. < /p >