Out Of The Misunderstanding Of College Students' Venture Financing

Misunderstanding 1: eager to get the business startup or working capital, give small money to big shares, and sell technology or creativity.

Many core technology owners were deeply dissatisfied with the original investment agreement after they had been in the company for a period of time.

Myth two: even if investors can't provide value-added services and management guidance, they are still with them.

It is very difficult for university students to find financing objects. Finding one is like finding a life-saving straw, and thinking that money can solve all entrepreneurial difficulties, such financing will bring a lot of trouble to the subsequent development.

Misunderstanding three: irresponsible use of venture capital, burning others' money to fulfill their dreams.

Investors in each round of financing will affect the feasibility and value assessment of subsequent financing.

Therefore, for the early start-up companies, we should introduce some investors who are really strong, can provide value-added services, and have a unified concept with entrepreneurs, even if this means giving up some immediate interests temporarily.

Capital is essential to the company's blood, so financing is especially important for new ventures.

If university students want to get their due return by their own technology or creativity, they must solve the financing problem.

In view of the above three misunderstandings, the entrepreneurs need to do the following work in the process of financing:

First, we must accurately assess the value of physical and intangible assets before formulating financing programs. We must not underestimate ourselves by underestimating ourselves.

After several rounds of financing and listing, NetEase has more than 60% of Ding Lei's shares. This shows that Ding Lei has achieved his goal in a small amount of shares in each round of financing. It is an example for us to learn.

Second, in the financing process, we must do a good job in financing options. The comparison and selection of multi-channel financing can effectively reduce financing costs and improve efficiency.

If equity financing is adopted, investors must be well chosen.

Only investments that are similar to one's own business philosophy and whose business or ability can provide channels or guidance for investment projects can effectively support the growth of enterprises.

Third, entrepreneurship is not only an ideal process, but also a process of maintaining and increasing the investment of investors (shareholders).

Entrepreneurs and investors are two aspects of a thing. We can only achieve the goal of win-win through the carrier of the enterprise.

The question of "burning investors' money to fulfill their dreams" is, in the final analysis, the issue of entrepreneurs' credit. People who embrace this idea will not become a successful entrepreneur.

Entrepreneurs who can create value for shareholders can get more financing opportunities and growth opportunities.

Therefore, entrepreneurs should not only strengthen their own technical ability, but also have the moral demeanor of entrepreneurs.

To solve the problem of financing, University entrepreneurs can pform their own technology and creativity into profitable tools, so that they can remain invincible in the fierce market competition.